Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk Erichsen, et al v. County of Orange, et al
as 17-56451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK R. ERICHSEN, an individual, KRYSTAL ERICHSEN, an individual, Z. E., a minor and others
Appellant:
CHANDLER PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, TUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Dyer v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2017cv11452
Defendant:
City of Boston , Steward Health Care System LLC , Carney Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapdelaine v. Eastford
as 16-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darlene Anne Chapdelaine
Defendant - Appellee:
Town of Eastford, its officials, Inland Wetlands Watercourse Commission, Town of Eastford, Thomas DeJohn and others
Defendant:
Gary Warren, Deborah Torcellini, Paul Torcellini and others
Andersen v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv01963
Plaintiff:
Daniel Andersen
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, James Bednarkiewicz, Richard Bedran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapdelaine v. Eastford et al
as 3:2015cv01222
Plaintiff:
Darlene Anne Chapdelaine
Defendant:
Town of Eastford , Inland Wetlands Watercourse Commission , Thomas DeJohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
