Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ortiz v. Michael Robert Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Chicago Northside Toyota
as 1:2023cv02413
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ortiz
Defendant:
Michael Robert Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Chicago Northside Toyota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Miller v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02976
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roberts v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 1:2022cv06441
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberts
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Gomez v. Roberts et al
as 1:2021cv02619
Defendant:
Linda Schmid, Robert Loncar, Hon. Judge Jean Golden and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Exeter Finance Corp v. Michael Roberts Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2016cv10282
Plaintiff:
Exeter Finance Corp
Defendant:
Michael Roberts Enterprises, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leibowitz v. Shindler et al
as 1:2016cv07092
Plaintiff:
David P Leibowitz
Defendant:
Keith S. Shindler, Michael Robert Joyce, Shindler & Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roberts v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11788
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberts
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
