Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith
Defendant:
MD Carla Rogers, MHM Centurion, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv01371
Petitioner:
Michael S. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Warden Christopher Schell, Franklin County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Bell
as 3:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Michael S Smith
Defendant:
Kevin E Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith, Jr. v. Zanic et al
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
George N. Zanic and David G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Myers et al
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Shawn Myers and Mary Beth Shank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Myers
as 1:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Shawn Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11576
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Appel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11433
Plaintiff:
Moira Horan, Peter McNamara, Margaret McCormick and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Michael S. Smith et al v. Estate of Brian Sheppard et al
as 2:2017cv05644
Defendant:
Does, Estate of Brian Sheppard and Western Heritage Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Niles and Michael S. Smith
Liberta v. Smith
as 6:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Quintino D. Liberta
Defendant:
Michael S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
