Cases 41 - 50 of 62
In Re: Michael Sharpe
as 11-4514
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL SHARPE
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SHARPE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv07163
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SHARPE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Sharpe v. Ediberto Medina, et al
as 11-3243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHARPE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDIBERTO MEDINA, DIANE HESS, R.N., M. ANGUD, M.L.P. and others
In Re: Michael Sharpe
as 11-3169
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL SHARPE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Sharpe
as 11-2592
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHARPE
Michael Sharpe v. J.T. Shartle
as 11-2226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHARPE
Defendant - Appellee:
J.T. SHARTLE, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fred Moore, et al v. City of DeSoto, et al
as 10-11298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED MOORE, Individually and as Next Friends of AM, a minor and JM, a minor, TANYA MOORE, Individually and as Next Friend of AM, a minor and JM, a minor and KARMEN SHAVER, Individually and as Next Friend of AC, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DESOTO, ERIN BLUST, STEVE THOMAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
IN RE SHARP
as 10-1148
Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Appellant:
Michael Sharp, Michael Sharp, Michael Sharp and others
Michael Sharp:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
