Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Holloman v. Shelman-Goetsch et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Marvin Holloman
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Shelman-Goetsch, Michelle Renae Smith, Craig D. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fideicomiso Alan Michael Smythe v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
as 3:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Fideicomiso Alan Michael Smythe through its Trustee Kenneth Smythe Fuentes and Fideicomiso Alan Michael Smythe
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
Defendant:
The Prentice-All Corporation System, PR
Cross Defendant:
Alan Michael Smythe Trust
3Rd Party Defendant:
Carmen Sanchez Lamoso
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2020cv02266
Defendant:
Charles Roger, Lura H Parsky, Peter Daddeh and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lewis v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04710
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lewis
Defendant:
City Of New York, Undercover Officer UC 0114, John Scollo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smythe v. USA
as 4:2016cv00701
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Smythe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Smythe v. United State
as 16-2018
Petitioner:
Michael Smythe
Respondent:
United States of America
Capellan v. Smyth et al
as 1:2015cv09815
Plaintiff:
Dahiana Capellan
Defendant:
Michael Smyth and John and Jane Doe 1 through 8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07470
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Garcia, Judith Fadul, Yazmin De La Rosa and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Smyth, David Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midlab, Inc. v. Smythe
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Midlab, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Smythe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owens v. Smyth et al
as 1:2014cv05464
Plaintiff:
Jason Owens
Defendant:
Michael Smyth, Jesus Guzman and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
