Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Calvin Roach v. Donald Washington, et al
as 21-3045
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, HONORABLE PAUL IRVING, U.S. House of Representatives, HONORABLE DONALD W. WASHINGTON, U.S. Marshals Service Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN ROACH
Roach v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv04905
Defendant:
Hon. Paul Irving, Hon. Donald W. Washington, Hon. Christopher Wray and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTANON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv02545
Plaintiff:
LAURIE DAVIS, VANESSA FRANCIS, SUSANNAH WEAVER and others
Defendant:
PAUL RYAN, KAREN L. HAAS, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
MERKLEY v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2018cv02226
Defendant:
Senator MITCH MCCONNELL, WILLIAM BURCK, Senator CHARLES GRASSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
Senator JEFF MERKLEY and JEFF MERKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Michael Stenger, et al v. Bi-State Development Agency, et al
as 15-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Stenger, Tim Dempsey, Mike Little and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District, doing business as Metro
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 788
Stenger et al v. Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
as 4:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Michael Stenger , Tim Dempsey , Mike Little and others
Defendant:
Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
Intervenor_defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Diviision 788
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Stenger et al. v. Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
as 4:2014cv01646
Plaintiff:
Michael Stenger
Defendant:
Bi-State DevelopmentAgency of Missouri / Illinois Metropolitan District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
