Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sutton et al. v. Lentz et al.
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Michael Sutton and Kenny Phillips
Defendant:
Daniel Lentz, Michael Keane, Carl Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scanlan et al v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
Michael Scanlan, Nedaal Hamud, Travis Lewis and others
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Shelby County Jail Division, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallett v. Sutton
as 5:2020cv03031
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Mallett, III
Defendant:
Michael Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rohan (ID 122011) v. Saline County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv03068
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Rohan
Defendant:
Jamie (lnu), Saline County Jail, Lou Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKES v. CASEY et al
as 3:2017cv06120
Plaintiff:
LARRY DUKES
Defendant:
MARY CASEY, THIERRY LEMMERLING, JOHN YURKOVIC, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Gore
as 3:2016cv01854
Petitioner:
Michael Sutton
Respondent:
William D. Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sutton v. Schlegel et al
as 1:2014cv03166
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Sutton
Defendant:
Jim Schlegel, Corizon and Adams County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2014cv02439
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Sutton
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logue v. Saline County, KS Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2013cv03151
Plaintiff:
Roger Lewis Logue, Sr.
Defendant:
Saline County, KS Sheriff Department, Alan Sites, J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logue v. Saline County, KS Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2013cv00844
Plaintiff:
Roger Lewis Logue, Sr.
Defendant:
Saline County, KS Sheriff Department, Alan Sites, J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
