Cases 1 - 10 of 29
National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al v. USA
as 21-5291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
National Veterans Legal Services Program, National Consumer Law Center and Alliance for Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael T. Pines
Michael Pines v. USDC-WAWTA
as 21-71023
Not Classified By Court:
TESSA M. GORMAN, CLALLAM COUNTY, Washington, CITY OF SEQUIM, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL T. PINES
Parkwell v. Pines et al
as 3:2021cv05233
Defendant:
Michael T Pines and James Howard
Plaintiff:
Tom Parkwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pines v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv01730
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Pines
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pd
Pines v. Director of Atascadero State Hospital
as 3:2018cv02750
Petitioner:
Michael T. Pines
Respondent:
Director of Atascadero State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael T Pines v. Director of Atascadero State Hospital et al
as 2:2018cv06854
Defendant:
Director of Atascadero State Hospital, Stevenson, Public Defender Blum and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pines v. Director of Atascadero State Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv01876
Defendant:
Jackie Lacey, State Bar of California, James Romo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pines v. Director of Atascadero State Hospital
as 3:2018cv04512
Petitioner:
Michael T Pines
Respondent:
Director of Atascadero State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pines v. Director of Atascadero State Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv04386
Defendant:
Public Defender Blum, Director of Atascadero State Hospital, Parole Agent Stevenson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
