Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Smith, et al v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 23-1801
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL W. SMITH and JOSHUA D. WARNER
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGG SCOTT, ERIC KUNKEL and GREG DONATHAN
Smith et al v. Hyundai Motor America Corporation
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
John Michael Smith and Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hudson v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Logan Tyler Hudson
Defendant:
Administrator Michael W. Smith, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Donathan et al
as 4:2021cv04099
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, John Doe, Ngozi Ezike and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv03342
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kunkel
as 4:2020cv04271
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Eric Kunkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv04264
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, United States of America and United States Department of Treasury
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Warner and Michael W Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2020cv04262
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua Warner
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, J B Pritzker and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
