Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IRENE et al v. MICHAEL WHALEY INTERIORS, INC et al
as 2:2019cv14998
Defendant:
MICHAEL WHALEY INTERIORS, INC and MICHAEL WHALEY
Plaintiff:
ALISON IRENE and LARRY IRENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Whaley v. Court of Criminal Appeals TX, et al
as 18-10420
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WHALEY
Respondent - Appellee:
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PARDONS & PAROLES, JUDGE OF 282ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT and others
Whaley v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Michael Whaley
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whaley v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv00803
Petitioner:
Michael Whaley
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whaley v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv00650
Petitioner:
Michael Whaley
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baley et al v. The City of New York et al
as 7:2012cv08027
Plaintiff:
Robert Baley , Christopher Chisholm , Tony Clanton and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Martin J. Horn and Dora B. Schriro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv09492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
