Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mckenzie v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mckenzie
Defendant:
Allied Trust Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017cv00530
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017mi00004
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Ruch v. Michelle McKenzie, et al
as 16-16175
Appellant:
ALAN GRUEN, JAMES WHITMIRE, JOSEPH SPILLANE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUCH
John Ruch v. Michelle McKenzie, et al
as 16-16175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN RUCH
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHELLE MCKENZIE, ALAN GRUEN, BROWN and others
Ruch v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2015cv03296
Plaintiff:
John Ruch
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Michelle McKenzie, Alan Gruen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2014cv04816
Plaintiff:
Connie Michelle McKenzie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Klahsen v. McGladrey, LLP et al
as 0:2013cv03444
Plaintiff:
Rick L. Klahsen
Defendant:
McGladrey, LLP, McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, RSM McGladrey, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Klahsen v. McGladrey, LLP et al
as 0:2013cv03438
Plaintiff:
Rick L. Klahsen
Defendant:
McGladrey, LLP, McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, RSM McGladrey, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
