Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Grady v. Lee et al
as 7:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Capt. Bostie, Major Nichelson, Jack Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Irvin Eugene Grady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
William I. Patrick
Defendant:
John Lilly and Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fink v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2018cv00392
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Jerry Fink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allman v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2018cv00348
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott Allman
Defendant:
Rockingham County Jail and Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Jackson v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 15-7773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LEANARD JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDDLE RIVER REGIONAL JAIL
Wheeler v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2012cv00359
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Wade Hampton Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2012cv00299
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2012cv00249
Defendant:
Cpl. Hinton, Supt. Jack Lee, Middle River Regional Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Lee et al
as 7:2012cv00244
Defendant:
Jack Lee, Medical Department, Middle River Regional Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2010cv00462
Defendant:
Cpl. Jack Hinton, Officer Chad Marshall, Middle River Regional Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Luis Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
