Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Miguel Lugo
as 22-10812
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL MARTIN LUGO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MEJIAS et al v. GOYA FOODS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12365
Defendant:
PETER UNANUE, REBECCA RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY FULLER, ANIBAL MEJIAS, DENNIS MINTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez Lugo et al v. Bordes et al
as 7:2018cv03564
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rodriguez Lugo , Richard Macas , Hernan G. Corail Sr. and others
Defendant:
Michael A. Bordes and Jedson Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miguel A Lugo, et al v. Joseph L McGrath
as 2:2003cv02004
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Lugo
Respondent:
Amy Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. Lugo et al
as 1:2012cv03731
Plaintiff:
Rufus Newberry
Defendant:
Miguel A. Lugo and John Doe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ambert et al v. Caribe Equity Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01254
Plaintiff:
Luis Ambert , Marcos A Ayala , Brunilda Babilonia and others
Defendant:
Caribe Equity Group, Inc., Abnel Crespo , Raul Villalobos and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Lugo-Rivera et al v. Hospital de la Concepcion et al
as 3:2009cv01059
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lugo-Rivera, Juan Carlos Lugo-Valle, Maria Lugo-Valle and others
Defendant:
Hospital de la Concepcion, Medlife Ambulance Corp., Sibel N. Pabon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huffman et al v. Crane Plumbing, LLC
as 6:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Huffman, Jerry Blagg, David Antis and others
Defendant:
Crane Plumbing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
