Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
US v. Miguel Lopez-Resendiz
as 22-4741
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-RESENDIZ
Lopez-Lopez v. Garland
as 22-844
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Miguel Lopez-Perez v. Attorney General United States
as 21-3288
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez-Vargas et al v. Doctors Center Hospital Bayamon, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01284
Defendant:
DOCTORS CENTER HOSPITAL BAYAMON, INC., SINDICATO DE ASEGURADORES PARA LA SUSCRIPCIN CONJUNTA DE SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD PROFESIONAL MDICO-HOSPITALARIA, Members of the Estate of Jesus Lopez-Vargas and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-VARGAS, JOSE RAFAEL LOPEZ-VARGAS and MILAGROS DEL PILAR LOPEZ-VARGAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jimenez et al v. JAC Construction Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv11797
Plaintiff:
Nelson Jose Lacret, Rudy Javier Souto Vieira, Jose Angel Freitas Vargas and others
Defendant:
JAC Construction Inc., Maria Cuaya, JCH Framing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00140
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miguel Lopez-Castanon v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60850
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-CASTANON
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Miguel Lopez-Mendoza v. William Barr
as 19-56233
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-MENDOZA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
