Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Jovan Battle v. Bruce Faulkner, et al
as 18-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE FAULKNER, The supervisor of field services for NRC, RANDY PFISTER, The Head Warden, JOHN DOE, The field service employee #1 and others
Jovan Battle v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 18-1980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY PFISTER, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Jovan Battle v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 18-1822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, NRC Head, Warden, OFFICER ROMANN, 3 to 11 Shift, OFFICER GARDNER, 3 to 11 Shift and others
Jovan Battle v. State of Illinois, et al
as 18-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, JOHN DOE, Sgt.(3-11 shift), RANDY PFISTER and others
Jovan Battle v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 18-1820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATEVILLE NRC MENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, RANDY PFISTER and others
Battle v. Kink et al
as 3:2018cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Warden Kink, Counselor Camp, Counselor Inbolden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02320
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, NRC Lutient Givens, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Faulkner et al
as 1:2018cv02222
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Bruce Faulkner, Randy Pfister, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Statesville Mailroom Department, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
