Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Guerrero v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Miguel Guerrero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Guerrero v. DYWIDAG Systems International, USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06613
Plaintiff:
Miguel Guerrero
Defendant:
DYWIDAG Systems International, USA, Inc., DSI Holding USA Inc. Profit and Retirement Plan, Mike Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Guerrero v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01631
Plaintiff:
Miguel Guerrero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jennifer Robles et al v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04682
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Robles, Morena Menjivar Rivas and Miguel Guerrero
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Guerrero et al v. Global Pipeline, LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Miguel Guerrero, Alonso de Santiago, Adan Sandoval and others
Defendant:
Global Pipeline, LLC and Vincent Garza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Guerrero v. United States Gypsum Company et al
as 3:2021cv01502
Plaintiff:
Miguel Guerrero
Defendant:
United States Gypsum Company and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Guerrero v. Barr
as 20-2471
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Miguel Guerrero
USA v. Miguel Guerrero
as 19-50307
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL GUERRERO, also known as "Mike"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
