Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Dejene et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv03328
Plaintiff:
Wondwossen Dejene and Miguel Mendez
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, DOE Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
(HC) Mendez v. Warden, FCI Herlong
as 2:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
Miguel Mendez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Herlong and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mendez v. FedEx Express et al
as 5:2023cv10315
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mendez
Defendant:
Fed Ex Freight East, THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FedEx Express and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451 Motion to Correct Order & Judg. of Naturalization
Mendez et al v. Angelina County District Attorney's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mendez, Jacob Woodard, Margaret Black and others
Defendant:
Abel Acosta, Judge Paul White, The Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bill Allen v. Furley Williams et al
as 5:2017cv02205
Plaintiff:
Bill Allen
Defendant:
Does, Miguel Mendez, James Watson and others
Miguel Mendez v. Fedex Express, et al
as 17-1178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIGUEL MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellant:
FEDEX EXPRESS and AETNA
USA v. Fidel Mendez-Hernandez
as 16-51129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FIDEL MENDEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Miguel Mendez-Hernandez
USA v. Eligio Mendez
as 16-41057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELIGIO SAN MIGUEL MENDEZ
Mendez Garcia, et al v. Lynch
as 16-9502
Petitioner:
JOSE MIGUEL MENDEZ GARCIA and MIGUEL ESTUARDO MENDEZ GARCIA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
