Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Charles Steele v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 25-3354
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. STEELE
Defendant:
GOVERNOR MIKE DEWINE, TIMOTHY J. MCGINTY, Prosecuting Attorney, MARY WESTON, Prosecuting Attorney and others
Lance Pough v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 25-3277
Plaintiff:
LANCE POUGH
Defendant:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, OHIO PAROLE BOARD, KATHLEEN KOVACH, Parole Board Member and others
Lance Pough v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 25-3211
Plaintiff:
LANCE POUGH
Defendant:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, OHIO PAROLE BOARD, KATHLEEN KOVACH, Parole Board Member and others
Watters v. DeWine et al.
as 1:2025cv00514
Plaintiff:
Samuel Watters
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Doctor Eddie, Inspector Warden Kelly Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tingler v. Governor Mike Dewine, et al.,
as 2:2025cv00206
Plaintiff:
Charles Tingler
Defendant:
Governor Mike Dewine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Franklin-Samuels v. Trump et al
as 1:2025cv00041
Plaintiff:
Charlotte L. Franklin-Samuels
Defendant:
President Donald Trump, Vice President Vance, Governor Mike DeWine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joseph Shine-Johnson v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 25-3049
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH T. SHINE-JOHNSON
Defendant:
MIKE DEWINE, AMY ACTON, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH and others
Craig et al v. Holbrook et al
as 2:2025cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Craig and Amber Pritchett Wagner-Craig
Defendant:
Judge Michael J. Holbrook, State of Ohio, et al., Judge Carl Aveni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Picard v. Dewine et al.
as 1:2024cv02242
Defendant:
Mail Clerk Winland, Participant Evans S., Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Plaintiff:
John S. Picard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zelesnik v. Massie et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Defendant:
Knox Presbyterian Church, Cincinnati Bengals, Thomas Massie and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
