Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Taylor v. Neal et al (TV2)
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: Rickey Eugene Taylor
Defendant: Mike Neal, Mike Bice and Stephen Massengale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kapoor v. Rhea County et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff: Saahil Kapoor
Defendant: Rhea County, Rhea County Sheriff's Department, Mike Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Rhea County, Tennesee, et. al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00133
Defendant: Mike Neal, Rhea County, Tennessee, Jesse Ailey and others
Plaintiff: Frances Gayle Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zone Five, LLC et al v. Textron, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv01059
Plaintiff: BTICG Leasing, Inc., Wayne Lewis, Aginty, Inc. and others
Defendant: Textron Aviation Rhode Island, Inc., Textron Inc, Textron Aviation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitley et al v. Neal
as 2:2019cv04165
Defendant: Mike Neal
Plaintiff: Gillian Ray Whitley, Jeffrey Francis Knifong and Jason Pipkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley et al v. Neal
as 2:2019cv04164
Defendant: Mike Neal
Plaintiff: Gillian Ray Whitley, Jeffrey Francis Knifong and Jason Pipkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knifong et al v. Neal
as 2:2019cv04122
Defendant: Mike Neal
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Francis Knifong, Tyson Middlesworth, Ian Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knifong v. Neal
as 2:2019cv04123
Defendant: Mike Neal
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Francis Knifong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knifong v. Decker et al
as 2:2019cv04121
Defendant: Decker and Mike Neal
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Francis Knifong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. Rhea County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 1:2018cv00133
Plaintiff: Glenda Campbell and Adam Davis
Defendant: Rhea County, Tennessee, Mike Neal, Melba Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?