Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10302
Plaintiff:
MILTON DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12152
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Davis and Patricia Davis Carne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Alvin Davis, III
as 22-4056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALVIN MILTON DAVIS, III
Paul Milton Davis Jr. v. San Bernardino Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2021cv01941
Plaintiff:
Paul Milton Davis Jr.
Defendant:
San Bernardino Sheriff Department, Sheriff Villarino, Sheriff Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis vs Wirco
as 2:2021cv02279
Plaintiff:
Milton Davis
Defendant:
Wirco and Wirco Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELLY v. DAVIS, JR. et al
as 2:2020cv02548
Plaintiff:
ELOISA MARITSA MELLY
Defendant:
VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION CORP., MILTON DAVIS, JR. and MILTON i/p/a CENTRELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ian Davis v. William Barr
as 19-71730
Petitioner:
IAN MILTON DAVIS, AKA Derrick Denckclair Mack, AKA Robert Howard
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Sternklar v. Davis Realty et al
as 1:2018cv07539
Defendant:
Russell Riccardi Architects, P.C., Reliable Plumbing Corp., Baumblit Construction Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sternklar
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Paul Milton Davis Jr. v. Conty of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv01325
Defendant:
Conty of San Bernardino, Dr. Brain Jarman and Dr. Brian Jarman
Plaintiff:
Paul Milton Davis, Jr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
