Cases 11 - 20 of 321
Michael Logering, et al v. Morrison Co. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 23-2376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael David Logering and Wendy Ann Acker
Defendant / Appellee:
Morrison County Sheriff's Office, Shawn Larsen, Sheriff; in capacity of Morrison County Sheriff's Department, Jason McDonald, Deputy; in capacity of Morrison County Sheriff's Department and others
Defendant:
Eric Hanneken, Chief of Police; in capacity of Morrison County Sheriff's Department, Calvin Tschida, Officer; in capacity of Pierz Police Department under direction from Morrison County Sheriff's Department primary officer on scene, Brad Bordwell and others
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Anderson v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2022cv03005
Petitioner:
Darwin Eldridge Anderson
Respondent:
Minnesota, State of and Ramsey, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MN College Student Assoc. v. Jay Cowles, et al
as 22-2722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Minnesota State College Student Association, Inc., doing business as LeadMN
Defendant / Appellee:
Jay Cowles, in their official capacities as Trustee Members of the Board of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Rudy Rodriguez, in their official capacities as Trustee Members of the Board of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Asani Ajogun, in their official capacities as Trustee Members of the Board of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and others
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC doing business as Bridge City Ordnance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Gary M. Restaino and others
Petitioner:
Prosecutors Against Gun Violence
Amicus Curiae:
Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Jonathan Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Tony Jackson v. Commissioner Paul Schnell, et al
as 22-2049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony D. Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Department of Corrections, Minnesota Board of Pardons, Clemency, & Parole, Tim Walz, Governor et al, State of Minnesota and others
Minnesota State College Student Association, Inc. v. Cowles et al
as 0:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
Minnesota State College Student Association, Inc. doing business as LeadMN
Defendant:
Jay Cowles, Rudy Rodriguez, Asani Ajogun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tony Jackson v. Find Jodi.com, Inc., et al
as 22-1652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony D. Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Find Jodi.com, Inc., 2010, Nonprofit, Find Jodi.com, Inc., 2020, Nonprofit, Josh Benson, Find Jodi.com, Inc., Organization Founder and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
