Cases 1 - 10 of 13
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 3:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH E. HEARN-NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA BARLATHER SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 2:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mitchell Nelson v. Boeing Company, et al
as 19-35401
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CUMMINS and BOEING COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL NELSON
Nelson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08640
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Nelson
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott Rose, et al v. Stephens Institute
as 17-15111
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT ROSE, Attorney, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL NELSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHENS INSTITUTE, DBA Academy of Art University
Scott Rose, et al v. Stephens Institute
as 16-80167
Plaintiff - Respondent:
SCOTT ROSE, Attorney, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL NELSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
STEPHENS INSTITUTE, DBA Academy of Art University
Mitchell Nelson, Sr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-17080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL NELSON, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Nelson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2010cv00378
Petitioner:
Mitchell Nelson
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Collier et al
as 4:2010cv00182
Petitioner:
Ralph Mitchell Nelson
Defendant:
Jake Collier, William Schultz, Kelly LaFave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
