Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2020mc00010
Defendant:
Wissam Abedel Jilal, Mohammad Souheil, Mohammed Souheil and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
Ohio, State of and Federal Trade Commission
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services et al
as 2:2020mc00117
Defendant:
Mohammad Souheil, Wissam Abedel Jilal, Prolink Vision and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01305
Defendant:
Wissam Abedel Jilal, Mohammad Souheil, Mohammed Souheil and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and Dave Yost
FTC, et al v. Educare Centre Services, Inc., et al
as 20-50113
Defendant / Appellant:
RELIEF DEFENDANT 9896988 CANADA, INCORPORATED and MOHAMMAD SOUHEIL, indvidually and as an owner, officer, member, and/or manager of Prolink Vision, A.R.L., also known as Mohammed Souheil, also known as Mike Souheil
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DAVE YOST and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2020mc00006
Defendant:
Educare Centre Services, Inc., Mohammad Souheil, Prolink Vision, S.R.L. and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC and Robb Evans and Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel. Attorney General Dave Yost and Federal Trade Commission
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
Mohammad Souheil, Wissam Abedel Jilal, Mohammed Souheil and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel. Attorney General Dave Yost and Federal Trade Commission
Not Yet Classified:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
