Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Barrales et al v. Ghost Beverages LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Tinamarie Barrales and Michael Williams
Defendant:
Ghost Beverages LLC and Mondelez International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sangrik v. Mondelez International, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01415
Plaintiff:
James Sangrik
Defendant:
Mondelez International, Inc., Mondelez Global LLC, Giant Eagle Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Judy Spector v. Mondelez International Inc.
as 17-3222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDY SPECTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC.
Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund et al v. Mondelez International
as 8:2016cv03000
Plaintiff:
Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund , Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Health Benefits Fund , Board of Trustees of the Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Mondelez International, Inc. and Mondelez Global, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Tindall Corporation v. Mondelez International Inc.
as 1:2014cv05196
Plaintiff:
Tindall Corporation
Defendant:
Mondelez International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tindall Corporation v. Mondelez International Inc.
as 3:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
Tindall Corporation
Defendant:
Mondelez International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monique Manchouck v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 13-17029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONIQUE MANCHOUCK, as an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Illinois corporation, DBA Nabisco
Manchouck v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 3:2013cv02148
Plaintiff:
Monique Manchouck
Defendant:
Mondelez International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
