Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ramirez Herrera v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2025cv00580
Plaintiff:
Monica Ramirez Herrera
Defendant:
The Kroger Co and Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
RAMIREZ v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04504
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
MONICA RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez-Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2907
Petitioner:
MONICA RAMIREZ-RINCON and NICOLAS ALEXIS ORTEGA-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Hernandez v. Cardenas Markets, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Monica Ramirez-Hernandez
Defendant:
Cardenas Markets, LLC and Lamanza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Minnfee v. Terrall et al
as 1:2018cv00136
Defendant:
Cathy Young, Texas Medical Board, Gloria Torres and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Abraham Hernandez et al v. City of Indio et al
as 2:2018cv02230
Defendant:
City of Indio, Does, Sgt. J Hapner and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Cruz, Estate of Abraham Hernandez, A. H. and others
Estate of Abraham Hernandez et al v. City of Indio et al
as 5:2018cv00562
Defendant:
City of Indio, Does, Sgt. J Hapner and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Cruz, Estate of Abraham Hernandez, A. H. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ramirez et al v. Oscar de la Renta, LLC
as 1:2016cv07855
Plaintiff:
Monica Ramirez
Defendant:
Oscar de la Renta, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Benitez et al v. AADIJ Investment, Inc., et al
as 5:2013cv03138
Plaintiff:
Anivar Villatoro Benitez and Monica Ramirez Rodriguez
Defendant:
AADIJ Investment, Inc., and Jayesh Parikh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
