Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dinkle v. U.S. Marshal Service et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Montgomery City Jail, Mac Sim Butler Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of Montgomery, Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Steven Reed, Darryl Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonio Oscar Tatum v. Montgomery County, et al
as 22-12137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO TATUM
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Vincent v. Waite et al
as 4:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Mr. John D. Vincent and John Vincent, II
Defendant:
Mr. Matthew Waite, City of Montgomery City, Missouri, Matthew Waite and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
