Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Harper et al v. United States et al
as 3:2017cv01975
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper, Montorey LLC
Defendant:
United States , United Nations, NATO
and others
Cause Of Action: cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Harper v. US et al
as 3:2017cv01976
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant:
US , UN, New York
and others
Cause Of Action: cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Harper v. CNN
as 5:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant:
CNN
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Harper v. US et al
as 3:2017cv01587
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant:
US, NATO, UN
Cause Of Action: bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Harper et al v. Extended Stay America et al
as 3:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper, Montorey LLC
Defendant:
Extended Stay America, Yellow Cab, Midway
and others
Cause Of Action: cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Harper et al v. US et al
as 3:2017cv01978
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper, Montorey LLC
Defendant:
US , UN, New York, New York US
and others
Cause Of Action: cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015mc01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Harper v. Obama et al
as 5:2016cv00703
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant:
Barrack H. Obama, DOJ, United States of America
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Harper v. US et al
as 3:2017cv01965
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant:
US , Washington, DC, UN
and others
Cause Of Action: cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Harper v. US et al
as 3:2017cv01966
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper, Montorey LLC
Defendant:
US, Washington DC, UN
and others
Cause Of Action: cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
