Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Foley v. Unknown Correctional Officer (Driver) et al
as 4:2017cv01462
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Foley
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer (Driver), Monty Hudspeth, Unknown Correctional Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 16-40665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female Texas Department of Criminal Justice Officer and others
Knight v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2015cv01549
Plaintiff:
Ken R. Knight
Defendant:
Monty Hudspeth, Frank Davis and Ms. Gerlach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brogdon v. Hudspeth et al

as 4:2014cv03277
Plaintiff:
Guy Christopher Brogdon
Defendant:
Monty Hudspeth, Gwenevene E. Williams, MD-ADS, Tawana Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flaming v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv02797
Petitioner:
Jarrod Neal Flaming
Defendant:
Monty Hudspeth, Gwenevene Williams, MD and Tawana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Applegate v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 14-20370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS APPLEGATE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MONTY HUDSPETH, OFFICER UNKNOWN TYLER and OFFICER UNKNOWN CROSBY
Applegate v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv01480
Plaintiff:
Dennis Applegate
Defendant:
Monty Hudspeth, Unknown Tyler and Unknown Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al

as 14-40021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female TDCJ Officer and others
Driscoll v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
John Robert Driscoll
Respondent:
Monty Hudspeth , Tawana Smith and Susan Dostal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Perkins v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 13-20729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DENNIS PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Senior Warden Jester and JACQUELINE JONES, Assistant Warden Jester
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.