Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Burgess v. Morgan & Morgan Law Firm
as 9:2025cv80276
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burgess
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dupin v. Morgan & Morgan
as 3:2025cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cory Paul Dupin
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: East Palestine Train Derailment
as 24-4086
Unknown:
In re: EAST PALESTINE TRAIN DERAILMENT
Appellant:
MORGAN & MORGAN
Interested Party:
ZOLL & KRANZ, LLC, BURG SIMPSON ELDREDGE HERSH & JARDINE, P.C., GRANT & EISENHOFFER, P.A. and others
Jackson v. Morgan & Morgan, Kentucky, PLLC et al
as 5:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Attorney Shea Conley, Morgan & Morgan, Kentucky, PLLC and Attorney Adrian Mendiondo
Plaintiff:
Shonda D. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv06518
Defendant:
Perfecting Faith Church, Carly Bass, Nathan Lee Both Plumbers and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville PLLC et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville PLLC, Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville LLC and Brad Milkwick
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shackelford v. Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Services PA
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jody Shackelford
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Services PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv04915
Defendant:
Darren T. Moore, Nathan Lee, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
