Cases 1 - 10 of 817
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pak et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Janet Pak and Joseph Kim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Logerfo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 24-32
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN LOGERFO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNI-DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC., UNITY ELECTRIC, CO., INC. and others
Elnenaey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 23-8091
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES L. DIMON, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, PLLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMED ELNENAEY
Defendant:
CYNTHIA G. ROSICKI, ESQ. and THOMAS PETER ROSICKI, ESQ.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
