Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company
Interested Party:
Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McGinnis v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Bonnie McGinnis
Defendant:
Akebono Brake Corporation, ArvinMeritor, Inc., BWDAC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Tanner v. Crosby Valve, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv02683
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Winston Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Janet E. Carpenter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv11810
Plaintiff:
Janet E. Carpenter, Tanya D. Hardin, Brian H. Carpenter and others
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., Carver Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Speck v. 3M Company
as 3:2020cv05845
Defendant:
VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION), 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING, MetalClad Insulation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Speck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
