Cases 1 - 10 of 205
(PC) Maldonado v. Barton et al

as 2:2025cv00772
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Shanee Maldonado
Defendant:
Robert Barton, Daniel Moeller, Michael Mette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Meriwether v. Mosqueda et al

as 1:2025cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Meriwether
Defendant:
Mosqueda, LLamas and Roque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Daniels v. Mosqueda
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Downey Daniels
Defendant:
Raquel Mosqueda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mosqueda v. Walgreens Pharmacy

as 2:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Ana Bertha Mosqueda
Defendant:
Walgreens Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosqueda v. CVS Pharmacy
as 2:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Ana Bertha Mosqueda
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RISE et al v. BAGSHAW et al

as 1:2024cv02388
Plaintiff:
Treacy Gaffney, Sonalee Rashatwar, Sam Rise and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE USCP OFFICERS 1-50, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHN DOE SUPERVISING USCP OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salinas v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00190
Defendant:
NFN Roman, NFN Mosqueda, NFN Stanger and others
Plaintiff:
Casper Salinas, Jose Salinas and Casimiro Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Rowe et al
as 2:2024cv00172
Defendant:
NFN Mosqueda, NFN Stanger, NFN Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Salinas, Casper Salinas and Casimiro Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 (b) Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.