Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Al-Haqq v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Ms. June Smith, Nurse Harrigan, Nurse Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
London v. Stiltner et al
as 7:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn London
Defendant:
S. Stiltner, Looney, J. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
London v. Stiltner et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn London
Defendant:
S. Stiltner, Looney, J. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felipe Rivadeneira v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-12736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE IGNACIO RIVADENEIRA
Defendant / Appellee:
D. RAY JAMES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRONIC CARE CLINICS, Medical Facility, THE GEO GROUP, INC., A Florida Corporation and others
Ferguson v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ansaro Ferguson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Israel Hamilton, Mr. Hankins, Mr. Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinard v. McCoy
as 2:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
Mr. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Hamilton, et al
as 7:2021cv00601
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ansaro Ferguson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Israel Hamilton, Mr. Hankins, Mr. Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Davis et al
as 7:2021cv00361
Defendant:
Ms. Harr, Warden C. Davis, Maj. Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Steven Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivadeneira v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Mr. T. Johns, D. Ray James Correctional Facility, Dr. Rick Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
