Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Bosworth v. Richardson et al
as 3:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Eli Daniel Bosworth
Defendant:
Enjoli Richardson, Mr. Baker, Jamarius Sparks and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Mr. Baker, Medical Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Denzel Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggins v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)

as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Riggins
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Teresa Norman, Mr. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Stitt et al

as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magana v. CoreCivic et al

as 3:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
Erik Magana
Defendant:
Unknown Individuals Responsible For Reporting PREA Incidents to The Bureau of Prisons, CoreCivic Medical Staff, Mr. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hoskins v. Rodman et al

as 3:2020cv01068
Defendant:
Mr. Shirley, John Doe, Mr. Oleary and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Swisher et al

as 3:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Larue Love, Mr. Ren, Mr. Bedford and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Swisher et al

as 3:2020cv00302
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Bedford, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Johnson et al

as 3:2019cv01303
Defendant:
Grittale, Mr. Bailey, Daniel Harriss and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littles v. Chief Medical Doctor et al
as 9:2019cv80395
Defendant:
Mrs. Baker and Chief Medical Doctor
Plaintiff:
Keith Lorenza Littles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.