Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Williams v. Massengill et al
as 1:2024cv03122
Defendant:
SSA, Scott Massengill, Mr. Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Vahn Omar Williams
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv04519
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden R. Bowers, J Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faison v. G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mrs. Simmons, Ms. Adams, G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney P. Faison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Reed
as 16-3711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hurbert Cary
Defendant - Appellee:
Duane Reed and Mr. Simmons
Cary v. Reed et al
as 1:2016cv06299
Plaintiff:
Hurbert Cary
Defendant:
Duane Reed and Mr. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00021
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv05023
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Baker, Sr. v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2015cv00800
Plaintiff:
Howard D. Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, P. Smith, Alex Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Travis et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Defendant:
E. Anderson, Lt. Brown, Bryner and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Connolly
as 14-188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent William Connolly, sued in their individual capacity, Mr. Charles Kelly, former deputy of security, sued in their individual capacity, Mr. James Bell, deputy of security, sued in their individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
