Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Dean v. Mrs. Brown, et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff: Todd G. Dean
Defendant: Warden Mrs. Brown, Counselor, Case Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00088
Petitioner: Jeremy Arsenio Smith
Respondent: Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stum v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00077
Petitioner: Terrance M. Stum
Respondent: Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00071
Petitioner: Dashawn Tyreek Dixon
Respondent: Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Demetrius Glenn v. Adam Ruffin
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEMETRIUS GLENN
Defendant / Appellee: ADAM RUFFIN, Attorney, MICHAEL HENTHORNE, Attorney, MS. WILLIAMS, Lt SCDC and others
Garner v. Kidd et al
as 1:2022cv06270
Plaintiff: James Garner
Defendant: Thomas Costello, City Of Chicago, Hashtag Vision, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mickle v. O'Connell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02498
Plaintiff: Marcus Mickle
Defendant: O'Connell, Nash, Lair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Plaintiff: Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant: Kevin Gates, White Boy, Billy Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Brown We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00164
Petitioner: Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent: Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDougald v. May et al
as 3:2022cv01058
Plaintiff: Jerone McDougald
Defendant: Harold May, Mr. Walters, Major Mr. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?