Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Todd Dean v. Mrs. Brown
as 24-6202
Plaintiff:
TODD GLENN DEAN
Defendant:
MRS. BROWN, Warden, MRS. BLUNT, Counselor, MR. PAYNE, Case Manager and others
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Shamain Johnson
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv02107
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Wilcox et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ramirez Brandon Lee and Brandon Lee Ramirez
Defendant:
DW Mr. Wilcox, DW Ms. Stewart, Warden Andrew McFarlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavins v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Correy Cavins
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henderson v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Shane Henderson
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
Dashawn Tariq Dixon
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
