Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Clark v. McFarlene et al
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Major Anthony Clark
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlene, Lt. Griffin, Cert Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. MacFarlene et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Major Anthony Clark
Defendant:
Andrew MacFarlene, Mrs. Griffin, Mr. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen v. Director of the BOP et al
as 1:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Director of the BOP, Warden, Justin Eckenrode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flowers v. Griffin et al
as 3:2020cv00850
Defendant:
Mrs. Griffin and Sgt. Boyd
Plaintiff:
Donnell Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Allsup et al
as 3:2019cv00770
Defendant:
T. Jones, Elvesizer, T. Brumley and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannady v. Griffin
as 2:2018cv02776
Plaintiff:
Danyell Cannady
Defendant:
Mr. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillaspie v. Huntsville CGO et al
as 4:2018cv03249
Plaintiff:
Zachary Don Gillaspie
Defendant:
Cpt. Hazlewood, Lori Davis, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dirig v. Wexford Health Sources Incorporated et al
as 3:2018cv00473
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Dirig
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Nancy B Marthakis, Tiwona L Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Phifer v. Corizon Medical Provider, et al
as 17-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES PHIFER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL PROVIDER, of MCF, DR. MARANDET, of Corizon, KIM MYERS, LPN of Corizon and others
Phifer v. Corizon Medical Provider et al
as 3:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Charles Phifer
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Provider, Dr Marandet, Kim Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
