Cases 1 - 10 of 186
PARSONS v. GRAY et al
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
WARDEN MR. GRAY, CAPTAIN MR. BURGESS, UNIT MANAGER MR. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Terrell v. Warden Dooly State Prison, et al
as 24-10577
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DOOLY STATE PRISON, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Al-Haqq v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Ms. June Smith, Nurse Harrigan, Nurse Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARSONS v. RANSOME A MALE NATIVE et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
DANIELL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
RANSOME A MALE NATIVE, RANSOME MALE NATIVE SUBORDANT, MS. HARDGOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armendariz Perez v. Warden Mr. Smith
as 4:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Irene Armendariz Perez
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Smith and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 6:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
