Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Marcus v. Ellison et al
as 1:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus
Defendant:
Corporal Ellison, Deputy Thomas, Deputy Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2025cv00067
Defendant:
Jane Doe, State of Ohio, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Vincent Ashford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Lassegue v. USA, et al
as 22-2475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LASSEGUE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. FOX, Case Manager USP Pollock, ALLENWOOD USP, BOP and Staff Members and others
Lassegue v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv01466
Plaintiff:
David Lassegue
Defendant:
United States of America, USP-Allenwood, USP-Canaan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AKBAR v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv05512
Defendant:
ALL PRISON STAFF ALL OTHER PRISON STAFF, MS. BURKE, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
BASIL AKBAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Michael S Young
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bryan Collier, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Davis et al -
as 3:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Michael S Young
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bryan Collier, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Franklin County Sheriff's Office Center 1 Main Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Franklin County Sherrifs Office Center 1 Main Jail and Mrs. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
