Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Ballard v. Carter et al
as 5:2025ct03081
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
Mr. Carter, Ms. King, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ceide v. Breckon et al
as 5:2025cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jean Claude Ceide
Defendant:
Michael Breckon, Brandi O'Berry, S. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akindele v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50404
Plaintiff:
Oluwole Akindele
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Mr. Mitchell, Mrs. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Mr. Hall, Paul Johnson, Cody Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
Trevon DeShon Chapman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
MACON v. GRESSEL
as 1:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
DANIEL T. MACON
Defendant:
MRS. GRESSEL, DR. CAMACHO, Mrs. MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Dave's et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hobgood
Defendant:
Mis Dave's and Mr Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Tulsa Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
Tulsa Jail, Satellite Sericer Inc., Ms Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galladay v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00823
Petitioner:
Kevin Galladay
Respondent:
Warden Mrs. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Carter
as 1:2022cv10705
Petitioner:
Willie Scott
Respondent:
Warden Mrs. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
