Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Long v. D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN et al
as 0:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Long
Defendant:
D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN, Ramsey County Correctional Facility-Workhouse, A.P.S.-Advance Practice Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mr. Dee's Inc. v. Inmar, Inc.
as 23-2165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MR. DEE'S INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RETAIL MARKETING SERVICES, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and CONNECTICUT FOOD ASSOCIATION, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
INMAR, INC., CAROLINA MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES, INC., CAROLINA SERVICES and others
Mr. Dee's Inc. v. Inmar, Inc.
as 23-249
Petitioner:
MR. DEE'S INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RETAIL MARKETING SERVICES, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and CONNECTICUT FOOD ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
INMAR, INC., CAROLINA MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES, INC., CAROLINA SERVICES and others
MR. DEE'S INC.,et al v. INMAR, INC., et al
as 1:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Carolina Services, Inmar Inc, Carolina Manufacturer's Services and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Dee's Inc, Retail Marketing Services Inc, Montana Food Distributors Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Rogelio Rojas Flores v. Sandra R. Brown et al
as 2:2017cv06373
Defendant:
Baltazar, Baltazar, Alissa D. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Rojas Flores
Nichols v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2015cv00676
Defendant:
Mrs. Dee, Sheriff Greg Hamilton, Grievance Sergeant Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Lester Paul Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Bates et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Butler
Defendant:
Dr. Bates, Mrs. Strickland and Mrs. Dees
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
