Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. Hage (Salim)
as 23-6185
Defendant:
WADIH EL-HAGE, FAZUL ABDULLAH MOHAMMED, MOHAMED SADEEK ODEH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MAMDOUH MAHMUD SALIM, Abu Hajer al Iraqi and Abu Hajer
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hage (Wadih El Hage)
as 13-1755
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Harun Fazhl, AKA Fazhl Abdullah, AKA Fazhl Khan, Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, AKA Abu Moath, AKA Noureldine, AKA Marwan, AKA Hydar, Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-'Owhali, AKA Khalid Salim Saleh Bin Rashed, AKA Moath, AKA Abdul Jabbar Ali Abel-Latif and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Wadih El Hage, AKA Abdus Sabbur
United States of America v. Hage (Ghailani)
as 11-320
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wadih El Hage, AKA Abdus Sabbur, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Harun Fazhl, AKA Fazhl Abdullah, AKA Fazhl Khan, Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, AKA Abu Moath, AKA Noureldine, AKA Marwan, AKA Hydar and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, AKA Fupi, AKA Abubakary Khalfan Ahmed Ghaliliani
Federal Insurance, et al v. Al Qaida, et al
as 1:2003cv06978
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission, Abu Qatada Al-Filistini, Abu Hafs The Mauritanian and others
Cross Defendant:
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Mustafa Ahmed Al-Hawsawi
Plaintiff:
ACE Global Market Syndicate 2488, Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member, Ltd., ALL PLAINTIFFS and others
Petitioner:
The Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia, Ahmed A. Kattan and Abdul Rahman I. Al-Noah
Interested Party:
United States of America
Intervenor:
James Owens, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burnett, et al v. Al Baraka Investment
as 1:2003cv05738
Defendant:
Ayadi Chafiq Bin Muhammad, Abu Rida Al Suri, Mohrez Amdouni and others
Plaintiff:
Janice K. Punches, George R. Bergin, Kimberly Franco and others
Receiver:
John A. Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 al Fed. Question: Airline Crash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
