Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Misty Coleman v. Hamilton County, OH Board of County Commissioners, et al
as 24-3453
Plaintiff:
MISTY COLEMAN
Defendant:
LAUREN A. SLACK, Individually and in their capacity as an employee of NaphCare, Inc., TIMOTHY SCHOLZ, Individually and in their capacity as an employee of the Hamilton County Sheriffs Office, NAPHCARE, INC. and others
Ward et al v. Bannworth et al
as 1:2023cv04849
Plaintiff:
Magnolia Ward and Bobbie N. Ward
Defendant:
Stacy Bannworth, Neil Pearce and Belinda C Agent of Presbytenian Village
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04292
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL N WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Maute v. Lampropoulos et al
as 2:2021cv00346
Defendant:
Merit Medical Systems, Inc., Lynne N. Ward, Fred P. Lampropoulos and others
Plaintiff:
Steffen Maute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Barrie
as 1:2021cv01129
Respondent:
Judge Tangela Barrie
Petitioner:
Bobbie N. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Ms. Jackson et al
as 2:2020cv00261
Plaintiff:
Bobbie N. Ward
Defendant:
Lee Arrendale State Prison and Ms. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
(PS) Ward v. Department of Child Protective Services
as 2:2019cv00652
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Ward
Defendant:
Department of Child Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goings v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv00212
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Goings
Defendant:
Kent E Brookman, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
