Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Digiovanni v. City of Sterling Heights et al
as 2:2023cv11341
Plaintiff:
Adam Digiovanni
Defendant:
Sterling Heights, City of, Wilson, Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Misfits A.D., LLC v. Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02093
Plaintiff:
Misfits A.D., LLC
Defendant:
Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Douglas v. Abrams Children Books
as 18-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas
Defendant - Appellee:
Harry N. Abrams, Incorporated
Defendant:
Abrams Children Books
Douglas v. Abrams Children Books
as 17-2064
Petitioner:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas
Respondent:
Harry N. Abrams, Incorporated
Abrams v. JP Morgan Chase Bank,NA et al
as 3:2014cv04264
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Chase Home Finance LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard N Abrams
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Richard Abrams v. Bank of Texas, N.A.
as 10-11255
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SURETY CAPITAL CORPORATION
Appellant:
RICHARD N ABRAMS
Appellee:
BANK OF TEXAS, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00482
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Abrams v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Richard N Abrams
Defendant:
Hartford Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Atrium Group De Ediciones Y Publicaciones, S.L. et al v. Harry N. Abrams, Incorporated et al
as 1:2008cv01569
Plaintiff:
Atrium Group De Ediciones Y Publicaciones, S.L., Atrium Group De Ediciones Y Publicaciones, S.L., Francisco Asensio and others
Defendant:
Harry N. Abrams, Incorporated, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
