Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Steven Monger v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-15864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MATTHEW MONGER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, D. K. SISTO, L. N. FLORES and others
US v. Flores-Rivera
as 10-1434
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
SONIA N. FLORES-RIVERA, a/k/a Mimi
Welch v. Texas Tech University Health Services Center et al
as 2:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
Donny Ray Welch
Defendant:
Texas Tech University Health Services Center, Lanette Linthicum, Denise Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
R. Johnson v. Paul Sloan, et al
as 09-11156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL SLOAN, JAMIE BAKER, J. SELLS and others
Mester v. Dickinson et al
as 2:2009cv03307
Plaintiff:
Morris Mester
Defendant:
K. Dickinson, A. Miller, B _ Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mester v. Dickinson et al
as 3:2009cv03746
Plaintiff:
Morris Mester
Defendant:
K. Dickinson, A. Miller, B. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Miller et al
as 2:2009cv00492
Plaintiff:
Jimmie T. Brown
Defendant:
S Miller, Flwanty, L. N. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bennett et al v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
as 3:2009cv00515
Plaintiff:
Omar Raamses Bennett
Defendant:
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Gary Gee, N. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts et al v. Newman et al
as 5:2008cv00133
Counter Defendant:
Mark A Roberts
Plaintiff:
Roberts Oil & Land Co
Defendant:
John W Newman, Martin L Thering and Daniel N Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Monger v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv01353
Plaintiff:
Steven Matthew Monger
Defendant:
James Tilton, D. K. Sisto, L N Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
