Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Castro v. Horel et al

as 3:2009cv04902
Plaintiff:
Carlos Castro, Carlos Castro, Carlos Castro and others
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, D. Mount, S. Beeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godoy et al v. Horel et al

as 4:2009cv04793
Plaintiff:
James Godoy, James Godoy, Rick Cruz and others
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, Francisco Jacquez, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Milligan et al

as 3:2009cv04665
Plaintiff:
Marcus L. Harrison
Defendant:
D. E. Milligan, B. Newton, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wortham v. Gonzalez et al

as 3:2009cv04474
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fernando Wortham
Defendant:
J. Gonzalez, N. Grannis, Debra Herndon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Hippo et al

as 4:2009cv04477
Plaintiff:
Horace A. Bell
Defendant:
G. Hippo, T. Kurtz, A. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Hedgepath et al

as 4:2009cv04358
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Ahmed Wright
Defendant:
A. Hedgepath, G. D. Lewis, M. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. Horel et al

as 3:2009cv04142
Petitioner:
Jason Page
Respondent:
R. Horel and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonty v. Neotti et al

as 4:2009cv04079
Plaintiff:
Miles O. Bonty
Defendant:
G. A. Neotti, J. Stevenson and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinett v. Curry et al

as 3:2009cv03845
Plaintiff:
Tony Robinett
Defendant:
Ben Curry, R. White, E. Galvan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonty v. Neotti et al

as 4:2009cv03838
Plaintiff:
Miles O. Bonty
Defendant:
G. A. Neotti, J. Stevenson and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.