Cases 1 - 10 of 4,309
Subodai Davis v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2023cv10406
Plaintiff:
Subodai Davis
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Melvin James Tunstall v. Nancy A Berryhill
as 2:2023cv04491
Plaintiff:
Melvin James Tunstall
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Henry L. Thompson v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kiya S. Newman v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2022cv05087
Plaintiff:
Kiya S. Newman
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR, DULCE SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deborah Thornton v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2021cv05238
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Deborah Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Maisha Hartfield v. Nancy Berryhill
as 2:2021cv02794
Plaintiff:
Maisha Hartfield
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yakina M. Spearman v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2020cv06893
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Yakina M. Spearman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
