Cases 1 - 4 of 4
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO (UAW) and UAW Local 6000 et al v. McClelland et al
as 2:2020cv12433
Plaintiff:
Michigan Public Employees Local 517M, Service Employees International Union, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO (UAW) and UAW Local 6000, Council 25, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
Jase Bolger, James Barrett, Jeff Steffel and others
Amicus Curiae:
Mackinac Center Legal Foundation and National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Idaho Building and Contruction, et al v. Lawrence Wasden
as 12-35051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDAHO BUILDING AND CONTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO and SOUTHWEST IDAHO BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Amicu:
INLAND PACIFIC CHAPTER OF ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION
Trump Plaza Associates v. NLRB
as 08-1304
Petitioner:
Trump Plaza Associates, doing business as Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Utah Education, et al v. Shurtleff
as 06-4142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UTAH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, UTAH STATE AFL-CIO, UTAH AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK L. SHURTLEFF, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Utah
Amicus Curiae:
SUTHERLAND INSTITUTE, UTAH TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, EVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
