Cases 1 - 10 of 152
In Re: Domestic Drywall Antitr, et al
as 16-8047
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROBERT PITTER, NICHOLAS L. DEMARCO, HOWARD GLASER and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
AMERICAN GYPSUM COMPANY, EAGLE MATERIALS INC, NEW NGC INC, DBA National Gypsum Co and others
RICHARDSON v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83630
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. and others
ARNOLD v. BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37873
Plaintiff:
ORDE E. ARNOLD
Defendant:
BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, ISBRANDTSEN TANKERS, JAS. W. ELWELL COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED , TEXACO INC , CHARLES KURZ AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , KEENE CORP and others
ALOISI et al v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as PAE/2:10-CV-64155
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., FLEXITALLIC, INC., Sequoia Ventures Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
ALOISI, ANN ALOISI and MARIO ALOISI
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
Joe T. Summerlin
Defendant:
Celotex Corporation , Raymark Industries, Inc. , Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SELF et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-92112
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO
Plaintiff:
SELF
PIERCE v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-91982
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO
Plaintiff:
PIERCE
GRAHAM et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-92043
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM
TAYLOR et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-92082
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO
KOUNTZ et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-92087
Plaintiff:
KOUNTZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
